MPLS TE from IOS-XR
I am working on just a simple MPLS TE tunnel from an XR device to an IOS device. I can get the tunnel up and connected with no problem, but as soon as I put in a static route to try and use it, I can't...
View ArticleLab date booked, looking for CCIE SP Bootcamp, any recommendations
I have set my SP lab date for July 2014, am now searching for a CCIE SP bootcamp, ideally in the UK for some time around March/April/May next year. So far I've been unable to find one, does any one...
View ArticleQuestions about workbooks and racks
Hi , I have the following few questions which i hope you answer: 1- I saw that the workbook for v4 seems to be available at http://www.ine.com/self-paced/ccie-security/workbooks.htm , can you confirm...
View ArticleINE Expanded Checklist v5
Dear friends,can you please provide me expanded checklist for v5 since cisco checklist is looks very weired and complex. thanks.
View ArticleTask 11.4
The task stated that only R2-R6 even numbers in third octet should be permited. I understand the matching parameters, but this also includes the 150.1.0.0/24 network. I included this as the first entry...
View ArticleTask 2.6 -- Alternate Solution
Hello, I wanted to see if the following was an acceptable solution: ip as-path access-list 1 deny 254router bgp 400 neighbor 204.12.1.254 filter-list 1 out I essentially got the same result, just...
View ArticleTaking SP Lab from Xian
Guys, sorry to bother you this fine evening. I am hunting for a SP lab date and I get to see one in Xian- China (please nobody should go and grab this date oh). Question that comes to mind is: How...
View Article5.22 EIGRP extended ACL and distribute-list another solution
HiMy solution to 5.22 is following:access-list 100 permit ip host 155.1.0.2 host 150.1.4.0 logaccess-list 100 deny ip any host 150.1.4.0 logaccess-list 100 permit ip host 155.1.0.2 host 150.1.6.0...
View ArticleRoute Priority
As far as I am aware in routing the following rules apply Route avaliability > Lower AD > Lowest path cost to choose best route and protocol, i.e. if the subnet 10.1.1.0/22 is known by EIGRP and...
View Articlehow often do you see cisco certified working with other vendors ?
hi allhave you see CCIE certified working with other network soluttion provider partners like: juniper, HP and others.will they be able to perform the tasks as with cisco ?
View ArticleINE CCIE v5 material
Hello, would anyone know by chance if INE will be releasing new videos for the v5 format or just be remarking the v4 stuff as v5? OR will they release some after the v5 bootcamps have started? Just...
View ArticleBGP SoO
Hi. I have a question about BGP SoO. what is the need for using this Loop-prevention method in BGP, whereas, I think, the CE router will drop the updates received from PE router due to AS-Path loop...
View ArticleEthernet Overhead for Traffic Shaping
Hi Guys,Let's say I have the following policy:---------------------------------------policy-map ABC class class-default shape average 1000000interface FasthEthernet0/0 service-policy output...
View ArticleMultipoint Frame-relay with virtual-template interface
i am unable to get route injected in R1, R2, R3, R4 routing table using Virtual-template interfaces.Can some one find the reason. Please find below topology and configuration and please comment thanks...
View Article13.20 - NAT with Route-Maps Solution Not Working
Hello community,I am wondering why R2 is not seing R5's replies when I ping 155.1.0.5 sourced from R2's loopback 0, yet R2 sees R3's replies and the configuration logic for both is exactly the...
View ArticleWorkbooks with TOC?
I'm sure this has been covered before, but is there a way to download the workbooks in a format with a table of contents currently? I'm sure I can find some copies in backup, but, regardless of that,...
View ArticleR&S v4.0 WB-1 9.24 IPv6 MP-BGP
Wondering why the network statement is not "Network 2003:1:0:11::/61? R1: interface Loopback 101 ipv6 address 2003:1:0:1::1/64 ! interface Loopback 102 ipv6 address 2003:1:0:11::11/61 ! router bgp 100...
View Article2.4 IGP Redistribution
Hi All, Could someone explain me why in the solution of this task, AD of the redistributed RIP into the OSP domain is change to169?I do not see any reason why it has to be done as there is only one...
View ArticleR&S - May Lab Dates Available
A few weekend slots are open in May and on June 1st if anyone is in need.
View ArticleMPLS TE Bandwidth Contraints, MAM, RDM
Hi Guys,I am not sure if this has been disucssed but is it possible to get good documentation regarding the above topics? The workbooks do not touch them but perhaps the Brians or any other person...
View Article