Bridge assurance vs. UDLD and Loopguard

Is it safe to say bridge assurance “replaces” the need for UDLD and loop guard in NX-OS only environments?

From my reading it does, however UDLD is still a feature you can enable, and loop guard is not a feature, but configurable globally.

I can only assume you would use these “legacy” features when connecting to IOS based devices that do not understand bridge assurance.

Is there another scenario / use case where you would use these features in a NX-OS environment over bridge assurance?

Thanks