Quantcast
Channel: IEOC - INE's Online Community
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10744

Mobile Connect/SNR CLI sent to PSTN

$
0
0

Hi All,

I am going through Workbook 1 (task 13.3 Mobile Connect Localisation) and seeing some behaviour that I don't understand. The scenario is this:


call from PSTN phone +15126026223 into DN 1002 on a SIP trunk. A remote destination profile is set up for 1002 with a mobile remote destination of +12065015555 which rings as expected.

The task requires that the calling party number shown on mobile is modified to be 5126026223. So I created a Calling Party transformation pattern for the RDP matching \+1.! and stripped predot (then applied it via CSS/partition)... and the ANI on the mobile was  15126026223 !? any ideas?

The number sent to CUCM already had + so I did not need to globalise it but I saw from a trace in the CLI that the '+' was being stripped:

05/28/2013 18:48:24.728 CCM|DbMobility: getMatchedRemDest starts: cnumber = +15126026223|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::192.168.25.5><LVL::Detailed><MASK::ffffff>

05/28/2013 18:48:24.728 CCM|DbMobility: getMatchedRemDest: partial match|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::192.168.25.5><LVL::Detailed><MASK::ffffff>

05/28/2013 18:48:24.728 CCM|DbMobility: removeLeadingPlus: Calling Party Number starts with a leading +, +15126026223 , removing it ... |<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::192.168.25.5><LVL::Detailed><MASK::ffffff> <<==============

05/28/2013 18:48:24.728 CCM|DbMobility: getMatchedRemDest: number to partial match is 15126026223|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::192.168.25.5><LVL::Detailed><MASK::ffffff>

05/28/2013 18:48:24.728 CCM|DbMobility: getMatchedRemDest: need to match 10 digits|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::192.168.25.5><LVL::Detailed><MASK::ffffff>

 

Eventually I tried sending the number from the gateway without the '+' and created a calling party transformation pattern on CUCM matching 1.! (as a test) and added it to the calling party xform CSS of the RDP's device pool - This modified the ANI sent to the mobile phone correctly to 5126026223

Hope that makes sense - can anyone explain as I thought the calling party transformation CSS on the RDP should alter the ANI sent to the remote destination...

Thanks

Samson


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10744

Trending Articles