Has the default behaviour of OSPF ABR summary routes changed? I have found several sources that indicate that the highest metric of a route contained within a summary will be used as the summary's cost, often proving it with show output. When I lab it up, without fail, the lowest metric is used for cost, whether I'm summarizing area 0 into another area, or summarizing another area into atea 0. This jibes with what the OCG says. I can't find anything about it in Doyle.
↧